![]() Note that at the beginning I said open a raw file: if you open a JPG in LR it sees whatever colour space and profile are baked into the OOC JPG. It's like adjusting the graph I mentioned without being able to see the ends of it. That's the point: unless you are going to send the image to an output device with a wider gamut it's best to edit in sRGB because you can't see what your edits are doing outside that space. This is assuming your monitor has sufficiently wide gamut of course - I realize that whatever LR attempts to use is going to be limited by hardware, but ignore that for now. See above - you are seeing whatever space you set ( I'm taking accepting the Adobe default as your choice of setting). Put another way, is the order of color gamut: Camera Native Color Space > Pro Photo > Adobe RGB > sRGB, and that if you are editing raw you are viewing in the native color space? If the paper is small it's possible the whole line won't fit on the paper: in these terms sRGB is quite a narrow colour space - a small piece of paper. That line goes on the paper but isn't the paper itself. As a very loose analogy, you can regard colour space as a sheet of graph paper and colour profile as the line of a graph. Note that colour space and colour profile are completely different things. ![]() You can choose which profile to apply (again, refer to the Help menu). Each maker has its own profile or, often, a set of profiles. a "Nikon" or "Canon" color space)? I mean, I assume that even camera sensors must have some limitation to the color space they can capture.Ĭonverting the raw data into an image involves applying a colour profile. Whatever colour space you set becomes the one LR uses until (if) you change it to something different. However, you can alter the colour space - read the Help menu to find out how. Whenever you open a raw file that's the colour space LR uses for the conversion. When you first use LR its colour space is set to whatever the default is (I think its Adobe RGB but you'd need to check). Put another way, is the order of color gamut: Camera Native Color Space > Pro Photo > Adobe RGB > sRGB, and that if you are editing raw you are viewing in the native color space? This is assuming your monitor has sufficiently wide gamut of course - I realize that whatever LR attempts to use is going to be limited by hardware, but ignore that for now.Īt the risk of sounding dumb, but I have to ask: so what color space is lightroom or whatever photo editor using when you open the raw file to display on the monitor? Is it the default (sRGB or Adobe or whatever you set), a "Nikon" or "Canon" color space)? I mean, I assume that even camera sensors must have some limitation to the color space they can capture. The best thing is just to try it and see.Īt the risk of sounding dumb, but I have to ask: so what color space is lightroom or whatever photo editor using when you open the raw file to display on the monitor? Is it the default (sRGB or Adobe or whatever you set), or determined by the manufacturer (i.e. Whether those shifts are enough to matter will vary from shot to shot, and they may not even happen. However, if the proportions of colours (I mean of red, green and blue) are different in the way the spaces are interpreted there may be some minor colour shifts. But aRGB is a wider colour space than sRGB so it doesn't matter that colours outside the aRGB space have been discarded. If you shoot in JPG everything that isn't needed for aRGB is discarded so there's no way of going back. So if you set the camera to aRGB it will use that space in creating out-of-camera JPGs but all the data are still in the raw file so if you go back to the raw file and do a new conversion in sRGB the software goes back to the original file and pulls the data for that space. If you shoot raw the data in the file are unchanged whatever you do so whatever colour space you choose the raw conversion just pulls out the appropriate numbers. ![]() ![]() Will it convert it to what it would have if I originally shot in sRGB or an altered form? If I take my photos in Adobe RGB and convert to sRGB with photoshop or lightroom will I be worse off than if I just directly shot in sRGB? I have searched the forum and searched google but cannot get a direct answer. Sorry this is a very simple question and I'm sure the answer is in the forum somewhere. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |